Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
Garcia seems to have put on quite a few pounds. Hopefully that continues to translate into improved power. So far so good in the AFL (.150 ISO). Hope it continues next season (repeat in Harrisburg?).
Nick Banks has flashed some power, but it’s been a pretty disappointed stint. He still hasn’t walked in 28 AB, but has struck out almost half the time (13 K). With a 46% K%, it’s impossible to hit for average, as reflected by his .214 AVG (and even worse .207 OBP).
Will — the Nats pushed C. Kieboom on to Fresno, so I would guess that they’ll do the same with Garcia. A year in the PCL will certainly build his confidence as a hitter.
Really, Garcia is the only potential-starter-level significant prospect the Nats sent to AZ, so it’s very good that he’s thriving. Reetz, Lee, and Condra-Bogan have all been excellent and probably have put themselves in position for NRIs to big-league camp in the spring. Lee and Reetz may also be forcing some 40-man consideration ahead of Rule 5. Meanwhile, Banks and Freeman are older guys who really needed to show something in this spotlight opportunity. So far, not so good. But Banks could still go to Fresno and turn into the next Yadiel Hernandez. We’ll see. Sharp and Raquet haven’t been bad, but they also don’t have the eye-popping clean slates of Lee and Condra-Bogan.
I’ll be interested to see how the Nats approach Fresno next year. Have they learned anything from this season?
It seems like they did. Around the ASB, they reshuffled large parts of their rosters, bringing quite a few nearly-ready arms back to Harrisburg. I wonder if they’ll also acknowledge how the park effects may also have a harmful developmental effect on both the arms and the bats?
The thin air out there may have players like Yadiel Hernandez/Carter Kieboom/Drew Ward (or any other half-decent bat) swinging for the fences, when their power would only carry the ball beyond the fence in Coors Field and not the other 29 parks, rather than seeking to make line-drive contact. But maybe that’s an out-dated idea, given the advent of the fly ball revolution we’re witnessing now.
Similarly, for the arms, we saw first hand how many of them just completely unwound in Fresno. Crowe, Guilbeau, Bourque, Mills, Williams, M. Sanchez, just to name a few, were terrible in Fresno, despite being fantastic in Harrisburg. Rainey, Fedde and Voth were all quite a bit better in the majors than in Fresno. I’d be willing to bet Crowe and his 6.17 ERA would have fared better in DC too!
We’ve seen the dreaded reverse Coors splits, and how it generally has a negative effect on batters and pitchers, I suspect the same thing is occuring in Fresno.
I hope Garcia follows Soto and just skips Fresno altogether.
To make matters a lot worse, they were using the MLB steroid ball in the PCL/beer league and AA and below were using a regular baseball.
Surprise stats: http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=t_ibp&cid=542
Thanks, KW. We have 4 dominant players in the AFL, great to see.
Will, I would have NOTHING but veteran retread pitchers at Fresno in 2020, which might create a backlog at Harrisburg, but so be it. Even guys like Fedde, Ross, and Voth struggled there. The only pitcher with considerable — almost amazing — PCL success was Austin Adams. He then (literally) caught the red-eye across the country, pitched the next day for the big club, struggled, and that was it. Yet higher-paid stiffs got trotted out there time after time. I don’t know if Adams would have “made it,” but his chances were better than those of some retreads like Jennings, Blazek, and Venters.
Oh well. I have no idea what they should do with the hitters. Yes, I thought of Yadi and Orange as “gap-power” guys before they became Grizzlies. Stevenson seemed to get a confidence boost from Fresno, but then he struggled with reentry when they moved him from CA to PA for shuttle purposes.
No need to question if Adams WOULD have made it. He already has made it.
He was dominant for Seattle. 51 K in 31 IP, 3.77 ERA and 1.09 WHIP.