Morning Reading

As mentioned in the comments, Sickels has done his first ranking of the farm systems and the Nationals came in at #14. This sounds about right to me, given how the system thins out considerably after the top-line talent.

First base, shortstop, and LHRPs are three areas of particular concern to me. Yes, there is Moore and Marrero, but it’s a chimera to think that both will make it to DC. Rick Hughes fans will shout me down, but he’s coming off a shoulder injury and has a lost a year of development time. Josh Smoker is the best LHRP candidate and has zero AA innings. Of course, any complaints about minor-league relievers is mostly academic anyway; roles and usage should be secondary to the primary concern of developing the arms themselves.

The low-level rumblings in Western Maryland and the Shenandoah Valley are becoming louder, as details and logistics start to come to light. I’ve already admitted that my bias is towards keeping things in place, but obviously keeping the affiliate within reasonable driving distance of DC is my second choice. I can’t promise to follow this story all season long (the focus is on the players first), but I can direct folks to the blog that is dedicated to that purpose.

As others have mentioned, this is par for the course in the minors. Ownership groups routinely play one city off another in hopes of a better deal, a better facility, etc. It’s their right because the team is, after all, a business. Municipalities also have the right to say no, because it’s their duty to decide what constitutes a fair use of public monies.

My only admonition is that it’s usually a downward trend. A double-A team leaves, a single-A team might replace them. An affiliated team goes, an indy team — which doesn’t have to follow territorial rules — might move in. An indy team leaves, a collegiate wood-bat league might come to town. But with each step down, there are fewer dates the ballpark is used, fewer opportunities for the public to enjoy the facility, and less revenue generated to maintain it.

Stay tuned for a look at the latest Nats Top Prospect list, as Kevin Goldstein from Baseball Prospectus has weighed in.

Author: Luke Erickson

Since 2009, Luke Erickson has been chief writer, editor, and bottle-washer of Potomac is his home base as a season-ticket holder, but he has visited every affiliate north of Florida at least once, with multiple trips to Hagerstown and Harrisburg.

3 thoughts on “Morning Reading”

  1. I was actually pretty pleased Sickels had the Nationals system at #14. Although this was the first time he’s done rankings, last year at this time BP, ESPN (Law) and other sources had the Nationals between #13 and #19, so the Nationals have held their ground even after giving up four of their top prospects. That’s pretty impressive, and a testament to: (1) their 2011 draft class, with the top four of Rendon, Meyer, Goodwin and Purke going a long way towards offsetting the loss of the Nat Gio Four; and (2) the progress of other players like Destin Hood, Robbie Ray, Sammy Solis and Michael Taylor.

  2. Its still possible that Freitas could make everyone forget about Derek Norris. Especially if he manages to learn the defensive side of the game. Goodwin could end up as an A prospect. Hood could become an A prospect.

    In any case there are lots of scenarios where they system could improve but I agree that replenishing the pitching in the higher levels should be a priority. The two lefty starters Solis and Purke are both trying to rehab arm injuries. That is not good.

    I was hoping for a multi-player deal with TB to acquire Upton plus some of their pitching that is coming out of the eaves in their system.

Comments are closed.