Skip to content

NationalsProspects.com

NationalsProspects.com

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Oliver Perez Won’t Cost Any Prospects?

March 24, 2011

One of the most valuable words they teach in you J-School is “allege,” which has been twisted by pop culture such that people think it’s merely a word that defense attorneys use at press conferences.

It means to assert without proof.

Allegedly, the signing of Oliver Perez won’t cost any prospects any innings. Yet he’s reportedly going to start the season at AAA. Both statements cannot be true, so let me explain why. In other words, I’m going to present some proof.

As we discussed yesterday, it appears that option status is going to send a few pitchers to Syracuse. Two of those pitchers are starters. One of them is Yunesky Maya, considered the #11 prospect in the organization according to Baseball America. The other is Ross Detwiler, a former prospect by the definition of him no longer having rookie status, but a promising young pitcher nevertheless.

Would it be unfair to assume those two are in the Syracuse starting rotation? I think not.

1. Detwiler
2. Maya

A favorite here, and the Nationals Minor League pitcher of the year for 2010, is Tom Milone. The 24-year-old lefty is also the #16 man in the Nats org, according to BA. Ten and eleven spots back of him are Ryan Tatusko and Brad Meyers. While both do turn 26 this year, they are still prospects.

1. Detwiler
2. Maya
3. Milone
4. Tatusko
5. Meyers

Thus, before you even cross into AAAA territory, you’ve got a full rotation on Opening Day with four of the Nats Top 30 prospects. And even when you do cross that prospect/4A border, each of these men is younger than Oliver Perez, who turns 30 in August. Here’s a look at them listed from youngest (turning 24 a week from yesterday) to oldest (turning 28 in June)

Shairon Martis
Luis Atilano
Garrett Mock
Matt Chico

And that’s not even including two organizational guys (Erik Arnesen and Jeff Mandel) that could conceivably lose their jobs or go back to Harrisburg, a place that’s expected to host BA-ranked prospects Danny Rosenbaum and Trevor Holder at the outset and Sammy Solis by midseason, joining the #10 man Brad Peacock.

If Perez is assigned to Syracuse, he’s going to cost one of those six men playing time, if not a job.

So does that mean Perez is going to become a reliever? Even if that were true, here’s a peek at some of the names we may see to start the season in Syracuse.

Collin Balester
Craig Stammen
Adam Carr
Cole Kimball
Josh Wilkie

And that’s not including either of the MLB-phase Rule 5 pickups or Harrisburg relievers such as Rafael Martin and Hassan Pena, who was the #30 guy on the BA list and was said to have picked up his fastball in the Puerto Rican winter leagues this past offseason. Not to mention, the likes of Tim Wood, Lee Hyde, Harvey Garcia, or Adam Olbrychowski. While it’s doubtful that at least two of those last three names will be sent down, it could send the third down or out.

And there’s nothing wrong with that, but the point I am trying to make here still remains… signing Oliver Perez and assigning him to a full-season affiliate to start 2011 is going to cost a prospect somehow, some way. It may be merely innings, it may be taking a step back in the chain, or it could mean a release. But to claim otherwise is simply foolish.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Nats Sign Perez, Claim Hyde

Next Post:

Minor League Transaction Update

23 Commments

  1. Mark L says:
    March 24, 2011 at 8:54 am

    Agree Agree Agree!

    I would much rather see Milone/Arnesen/Meyers @ Syracuse than O. Perez

  2. Section138 says:
    March 24, 2011 at 9:09 am

    Pleading ignorance here in advance; I do not know how the instructional league works. That said, could Perez stay in Florida and work with Spin Williams instead of going straight to a club?

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      March 24, 2011 at 9:17 am

      Yes, they call that Extended Spring Training (XST) and my initial joke on Twitter was “Well, there’s room in Auburn,” which in years past meant being assigned to the Vermont roster. Then, when the Spin Williams connection was revealed, it was “Off to the GCL!”

      But then the beat writers starting talking about him starting at AAA and questioning the effect to the system, intimating that it wouldn’t take anything away from anybody, which is simply not true if he’s not put in XST.

      It’s one thing to defend the signing as a low-risk move, but it’s quite another to claim that it’s low-effect because as I outlined above, it’s not.

      1. BinM says:
        March 24, 2011 at 2:06 pm

        Sue_D: They could always stash him in Potomac, like they did with Jesse Estrada last season; Then we’d both really have something to rage about!

  3. Section138 says:
    March 24, 2011 at 9:11 am

    That probably should have read, “Why was he assigned to Syracuse immediately? Was staying in camp and working with Williams not an option?”

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      March 24, 2011 at 9:25 am

      A to 1st Q: Procedural — Has to be put somewhere and the roster limits don’t apply yet.

      A to 2nd Q: It is, and there’s still hope that that’s what will happen.

      But sometimes we gotta take those “talk radio” pegs and hang a story on them 😉

  4. Max Power says:
    March 24, 2011 at 9:40 am

    You nailed this one right on the head, Sue. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

    1. SpringfieldFan says:
      March 24, 2011 at 11:42 am

      +1

  5. Feel Wood says:
    March 24, 2011 at 9:46 am

    So signing Oliver Perez may cost Garrett Mock innings, if not his job? Where’s the downside in that?

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      March 24, 2011 at 10:59 am

      If it were that simple, probably none, but any innings Perez pitches at AAA at this stage of season are innings that a more promising pitcher isn’t. And painful as this is to write, that may very well include Garrett Mock. The dynamic changes dramatically if Perez stays behind in XST for a few weeks and then gets a chance to pitch.

  6. Scooter says:
    March 24, 2011 at 11:13 am

    For what little it’s worth, I had not heard the allegation to which this post is responding. Perhaps it would have been useful to link to someone?

    Even without that, of course, your point can stand on its own.

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      March 24, 2011 at 11:29 am

      I didn’t want to single anyone out because the sentiment was expressed by more than one person in more than one way on more than one medium. I’m not looking to fisk someone “Fire Joe Morgan” style, I’m looking to express the opinion that this move is not without effect.

      1. peric says:
        March 24, 2011 at 12:36 pm

        In the end it could just be an “extended tryout” leading to a release? When you’re as short of quality starting pitching as the Nats desperation apparently tends to find a gallows height upon which to roost.

        The Nats have some pretty smart baseball folks in house and they have to know that the top 3 starters Riggleman has picked for his rotation almost guarantee a last place finish. Can this team withstand another 90+-100+ loss season?

        I suspect Rizzo is thinking / planning in advance to mitigate this apparent looming catastrophe as much as he can?

  7. Ryan S. says:
    March 24, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    I’ve read this blog a lot as someone who follows baseball closely including the Nats and agree with you 99% of the time. This is part of the 1%.

    While I agree and am very intrigued to see how Bones does in AAA, Martis/Atilano/Mock/Chico are just organizational depth. They are #6-7 starters and nothing they’ve ever done will say they’ll be anything more. Even Detwiler and Maya don’t have the upside to be Perez.

    Perez on the other hand has shown he can be a legitimate #2 or #3 starter in the majors. It’s obvious his problems are mental probably with being lazy after getting his big contract not helping matters. In fact, if you look at the organization only J Zimm and Stras are guys even have the ability to ever be where Perez once was.

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      March 24, 2011 at 1:03 pm

      Thing is, your comment made me realize that I had forgotten to list Meyers as the 5th man in the starting rotation. The peg for this story is the idea of Perez starting the year in AAA, i.e. 2 weeks from now. I don’t see him becoming a dramatically better pitcher in that timeframe. As I commented earlier, the dynamic changes dramatically if Perez is sent to XST and is then assigned somewhere else even as soon as 3-4 weeks from now. The current story is that he’ll break camp with Syracuse.

      1. Ryan S. says:
        March 24, 2011 at 1:11 pm

        But using the term ‘prospects’ to describe guys like Martis is really a reach. They are just filler so who cares if they start the year in long relief. I’m sure it was part of the deal that Perez didn’t want to go to XST.

        My main point is you have a lottery ticket with Perez. He might be a complete zero but he could also be a very good starter. Martis and guys like him are kinda just like small investments that you might need to use at some point but will never be anything special.

        Meyers will start in AA. He barely pitched last year.

        1. Sue Dinem says:
          March 24, 2011 at 1:21 pm

          But using the term ‘prospects’ to describe guys like Martis is really a reach.

          True, which is why I didn’t, describing Martis/Mock/Atilano/Chico as AAAA players.

          1. Sue Dinem says:
            March 24, 2011 at 1:59 pm

            Upon further reflection, that may have been a bit too harsh… sorry. You might be right about Meyers, though I actually did see him pitch in my trip to Harrisburg last May and he did look good.

        2. peric says:
          March 24, 2011 at 2:50 pm

          The problem with Perez is that he apparently never fully recovered from the knee injury he suffered in 2009. His loss of velocity and control date back to that point. Many think pitching is all in the arm but probably as much as 50% or more come from the legs and core. Legs are absolutely critical.

          Now it is possible the guy didn’t bother to build up his leg muscles as he should have. With knee surgeries both legs will atrophy. If you don’t keep after them you won’t come back with the same strength or flexibility.

          Is it laziness, lack of motivation and drive? Non competitiveness?

          Just from what I’ve read, it sure seems like Perez needs a whole heck of a lot of time in that weight room in Frederick with those personal trainers Zim uses. Or with the guys Morse, Bernadina, and Werth use? Does he even have a good personal trainer or does he just sit around drinking Coronas?

          These are the questions I would be asking if I were the Nat brass.

  8. BinM says:
    March 24, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    FWIW, here’s the way it shakes out for me, if I were in Rizzo’s shoes…

    >Syracuse SP’s: Detwiler(LH), Maya(RH), Milone(LH), Arnesen(RH), JD Martin(RH); Chico(LH) to swing duty, Mock(RH), Atilano(RH), & Martis(RH) either traded or released.
    >Harrisburg SP’s: Peacock(RH), Tatusko(RH), Roark(RH), Meyers(RH), Alaniz(RH).
    >Potomac SP’s: Rosenbaum(LH), Bronson(RH), Holder(RH), Barthmaier(RH), Lehman(RH); Fabian(RH) to long relief or demoted.
    >Hagerstown SP’s: Solis(LH), Frias(RH), Clegg(LH), Demny(RH), Taylor(RH); McGeary(LH) on DL.

    1. peric says:
      March 25, 2011 at 2:33 am

      I suspect Tatusko and Milone get promoted? Rizzo isn’t going to pass up the chance that Tatusko’s newly discovered 97 mph fastball might play in the majors. I expect both Holder, Barthmaier, and Rosenbaum will be in Harrisburg/Syracuse.

      One would expect that Martis, Mock, Atilano, Arnesen, Mandel etc will be demoted to Harrisburg or Potomac, traded or released?

      Frias is in Potomac I expect. Perhaps Solis as well?

      I still firmly believe they release Coffey and keep Balester. They eat Coffey’s signing bonus.

      1. Sue Dinem says:
        March 25, 2011 at 7:30 am

        As I just put in this morning’s post, releasing Coffey would back up the blather that the Nats might just end up releasing a MLB-ready player this spring.

  9. mel says:
    March 27, 2011 at 10:06 am

    Listen I never want to be disrespectful, buy Spin I am talking to you. I understand loyalty and to a certain extent I understand you being credited for turning a guys career around, but I have watched Olly for three ears in NY . I watched him carefully in spring training, and just let me say this (pathetic). He was a 93-95 guy who signed a $36 MILL CONTRACT 3 YEARS. He works hard and is a great guy and team-mate but watching him is painful. He sits 84, yes thats right he sits 84-85 and luck if you see him throw 87 . He now drops is arm slot to lefty’s and his confidence level is destroyed. The mets ate $12mill to get rid of him . Please Nat management dont give up on your young guys to give him a shot at AAA that would be a mistake . I like OLY and I wish him the best but guys,if he does not show progress pronto under williams , I would make it my business to move on

Comments are closed.

Pay The Bills




About/Contact/Misc.

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Resources

  • NationalsProspects on BlueSky
  • NationalsProspects on Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • The Big Board
  • The Nats Draft Tracker
  • The Nats IFA Tracker

Blogroll

  • District On Deck
  • Fredericksburg Nationals (Facebook)
  • MLB.com Nationals Draft Tracker
  • Musings about Sports…
  • Rochester Red Wings (Facebook)
  • Senators Fan Club (Facebook)
  • TalkNats.com
  • The Nats Report
  • Wilmington Blue Rocks (Facebook)

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
© 2025 NationalsProspects.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters