Skip to content

NationalsProspects.com

NationalsProspects.com

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

And Now We Wait…

September 26, 2023

For the first time since youknowwhen, we have a bit of a gap between the end of the minors and the beginning of the Arizona Fall League. Rather than just leave up the last post like an outdated flyer on a bulletin board, here’s a post to hold down the fort until something newsworthy comes along.

Otherwise, enjoy your National Pancake Day festivities…

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Monday’s News & Notes

Next Post:

The State of the Nationals Farm

21 Commments

  1. Will says:
    September 26, 2023 at 8:52 am

    Thanks again Luke for yet another (13th!) season of excellent coverage. It’s required daily reading on my end, and very much appreciated that you create this space for us to discuss the minutiae of the Nats farm system.

  2. FredMD says:
    September 26, 2023 at 8:59 am

    once again Luke your pitch count has no limits. not sure how you do it but THANKS!

    1. Mark L says:
      September 26, 2023 at 10:14 am

      Wow! 13 years. Time flies when you’re having fun.

      I echo the above, required morning reading.

  3. KW says:
    September 26, 2023 at 9:27 am

    While we wait . . . here’s a quick back-of-the-envelope list (so I may have missed a few) of guys who will be Rule 5-eligible this winter unless added to the 40-man:

    Pitchers: Cole Henry, D.J. Herz, Mitchell Parker, Andry Lara, Michael Cuevas, Holden Powell, Zach Brzykcy

    Position players: Kevin Made, Roismar Quintana, Brady Lindsly, Paul Witt

    1. KW says:
      September 26, 2023 at 9:29 am

      (Newly eligible this year. There are many who are carryovers as well, but none who have made a dramatic case to be protected.)

    2. Mark L says:
      September 26, 2023 at 10:16 am

      The two definite yes’s are Herz and Parker. Brzykcy if not for his T.J.

      1. Will says:
        September 26, 2023 at 10:53 am

        Brzykcy and Henry are in the same boat. If they’re healthy entering ST, they’ll need to be protected.

        1. KW says:
          September 26, 2023 at 11:17 am

          I don’t know of specific examples, but I’ve heard that it is actually easier to stash Rule 5 picks who are coming off injury because you can carry them on the IL for most/all of the summer and not have them on your active roster.

          I would be surprised if they don’t protect Henry. If they don’t, that isn’t a good sign about what they really think of his arm health.

          I see Herz as a given and Parker as likely. Lara wouldn’t make much sense, but his situation is similar to that of Adon when they protected him.

          Despite their need for relief assets, I don’t think they will protect Brzykcy. The Braves left a good relief prospect, Victor Vodnik, who was already at AAA, unprotected last winter and no one took him. (They traded Vodnik to the Rox at the trade deadline.)

          1. KW says:
            September 26, 2023 at 11:19 am

            An example: the Braves took Dan Winkler in 2014 even though he had Tommy John surgery in June of that year. That enabled the Braves to keep him on the injured list while he rehabbed in 2015, eventually making his big-league debut in September of that season.

  4. don says:
    September 26, 2023 at 3:37 pm

    Luke, your site is much appreciated!! A morning ritual.

  5. Will says:
    September 27, 2023 at 8:45 am

    Luis Garcia might have saved his career with his past two weeks. Since being re-promoted, he’s hit .310/.355/.517. On the whole, it’s been a very disappointing season for him, but with how poorly he played in AAA after his demotion, I was worried we might not see him in DC again, at least in a starting role.

    What I find really interesting, though, is the narratives (justly or unjustly) about Garcia compared to many of our other young hitters.

    Player A: 25 and 1 month, .252/.302/.397, very poor defensively
    Player B: 23, .245/.301/.416, average defensively
    Player C: 23 and 4 months, .266/.301/.383, below average defensively

    You probably worked it out, but A is Ruiz, B is Abrams and C is Garcia. Yet, due to prospect fatigue or came-from-another-org hype, or whatever, Ruiz and Abrams are talked about as cornerstones of the Nats’ future, while patience has run out on Garcia.

    1. Will says:
      September 27, 2023 at 9:01 am

      Speaking of turnarounds, it looks like Lane Thomas’ fairy tale story has turned into a pumpkin. Over his career before this season, he hit .237/.314/.412. Then he caught fire and hit a remarkable .302/.351/.514 in his first three months this season, which firmly planted him on many hot stove reports as the trade deadline approached. Well, since the start of July, he’s hit .232/.281/.420, worse than his previous career average.

      Did we miss the window to trade him at peak value? Probably. But who knows if anyone was offering any decent value for him in July. But with Wood primed to reach the majors next season, Garrett and Robles primed to return from injury, and Crews, Hassell and Pinckney looming on the not-so-distant horizon, I’m not sure Thomas will even retain his starting spot for very long next season.

      Speaking of selling at peak value. Did anyone else notice that Jeimar Candelario hit a mere .237/.324/.449 with the Cubs? It’s especially jarring, because he was red-hot for the Cubs immediately after the trade, hitting .485 in his first 9 games there. But hit .141/.242/.341 (27 g) since that mini-streak, and then got injured, and has been out for the past two weeks (might return this week). I’ll happily accept Herz in that swap!

      1. Mark L says:
        September 27, 2023 at 10:14 am

        Lane Thomas has 17 outfield assists so far, which is huge.

      2. Pichard says:
        September 27, 2023 at 12:16 pm

        Give me a break with Lane Thomas turning into pumpkin. Wow.

        Why are the first three months of Lane Thomas’ MLB season suddenly not relevant? Thomas’ BABIP in the 2nd half show he has been exceptionally unlucky at .250. His power numbers are better in the 2nd half and his K rate is the same. Baseball is high variance sport which is why numbers over a full season are the most important. Thomas has tools which have translated to MLB success.

        As mentioned above, he has a plus plus arm, and is the Nats first 20 HR/20 SB player since Soriano 17 years ago. Realize this site touts prospects, but many here love to downgrade the young players that have made it to the bigs with the idea that middling AA prospects are equal to or better than MLB players. Most have no clue how hard that jump is.

        Lane Thomas has improved from last year, and at 28, is in his baseball prime.

        The players identified in your post haven’t even had marginal success at AA.

        You have got be kidding to think that Hassell has flashed anything over the past two seasons to approach Thomas; Hassell has struggled for a season and a half with AA pitching, and he has no pop.

        Pickney? He has 17 AA at bats. He is going to challenge Lane Thomas for MLB at bats any time soon. Please.

        Crews. Dylan Crews slugged .278 at Harrisburg. Are you going to claim he turned into pumpkin?

        Lets wait until any of these guys prove than can succeed above A ball, before projecting a challenge to Lane Thomas.

    2. FredMD says:
      September 27, 2023 at 11:34 am

      good statistical comparison but I’ve always suspected something else with Garcia beyond stats. DM mentioned that they wanted him to go down and work on his preparation for each game. I recall his rookie year him clowning around in pregame warmups a bit more that what I would expect from a rookie. but I could be off base here.

      all three of them could stand to walk a bit more though nothing in their developmental stats says they will

    3. Jackson says:
      September 27, 2023 at 3:36 pm

      Although he has his issues defensively, I don’t think Ruiz is very poor in that regard. And he has, at times, shown potential to be at least an average catcher.
      Abrams, in my opinion, is above average defensively.
      Garcia is inconsistent but at times has been spectacular. I’m not sure how to categorize him.

  6. John C. says:
    September 27, 2023 at 11:46 am

    @Will: Context matters in analyzing “Players A, B, and C.” Player C is producing worse offensive numbers than the other two at a position where offense is more of a premium. Comparing overall production to Player B is fairly silly; Abrams is leading the Nats in rWAR (3.5) and is 3rd on the team in fWAR (2.2). Garcia is at 0.8 and 0.1. After a brief improvement early in the season in his plate discipline and walk rates he has since regressed and there have been questions about his conditioning. He’s a frustrating player to watch.

    1. Pichard says:
      September 27, 2023 at 1:52 pm

      Yep. The big concern with Garcia is he too much of defensive liability to even be a long-term option at 2nd base..

    2. Will says:
      September 27, 2023 at 4:17 pm

      True, positions matter a lot, but between SS, C and 2B, the difference as great as you’d think.
      League average by position this year:
      C: .236/.303/.393
      SS: .245/.308/.395
      2B: .252/.320/.397
      Compared against actual premium bat positions:
      RF: .252/.326/.432
      1B: .254/.331/.431

      But it’s also why Garcia, who plays the most offensively minded position, needs to produce more with his bat than the others. Still, it’s interesting to see how similar their offensive production has been, while the narrative around the three has been rather different. Has there been any by the Nats about Ruiz’s poor defensive conditioning this season? Someone might need to light a fire under him too. On the bright side, at catcher we have a few back up plans if Ruiz doesn’t turn things around next season. At 2B, after Alu’s failed audition, we don’t really have anyone to compete with Garcia. I guess Baker, but he hasn’t really done anything since he got injured. Lipscomb, maybe too, but he’ll also have pretty a wide open shot at 3B.

      Anyway, glad to provoke some discussion. It’s always interesting to learn through disagreement 😉

  7. KW says:
    September 27, 2023 at 2:55 pm

    Every rebuild has its Elijah Dukes and Lastings Milledges who can tantalize on certain days but are long forgotten by the time the team gets good again. (Sorry if I activated anyone’s PTSD with those mentions.) Garcia reminds me of those guys (who actually had better numbers than Garcia). Hope I’m wrong. Yes, the calendar still says that he’s young, but he’s completing his seventh season of professional baseball. And he’s out of options. When you’re out of options, you’re no longer “young” in terms of your future.

  8. John C. says:
    September 28, 2023 at 12:19 pm

    Lipscomb isn’t going to get a wide open shot at 3b. Vargas is the placeholder there until House and/or Morales are ready.

Comments are closed.

Pay The Bills




About/Contact/Misc.

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Resources

  • NationalsProspects on BlueSky
  • NationalsProspects on Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • The Big Board
  • The Nats Draft Tracker
  • The Nats IFA Tracker

Blogroll

  • District On Deck
  • Fredericksburg Nationals (Facebook)
  • MLB.com Nationals Draft Tracker
  • Musings about Sports…
  • Rochester Red Wings (Facebook)
  • Senators Fan Club (Facebook)
  • TalkNats.com
  • The Nats Report
  • Wilmington Blue Rocks (Facebook)

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
© 2025 NationalsProspects.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters