Skip to content

NationalsProspects.com

NationalsProspects.com

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Nats Trade Four Farmhands For Gio Gonzalez

December 22, 2011

Multiple online sources are reporting that the Nationals have traded four prospects for LHP Gio Gonzalez, a package that’s said to include RHPs Brad Peacock and A.J. Cole, LHP Tommy Milone and C Derek Norris.

While you might think that my initial reaction might be that we gave away the farm (hence the pic), I am personally pleased for Milone and Norris, both of whom will now be in a better position to make the majors. The American League has long rewarded lefties with good control and sharp breaking stuff (see Wells, David; Pettitte, Andrew). Norris now can be used as a DH if need be (Scott Hatteberg comparisons in 3… 2… 1…).

Both Milone and Norris were blocked to some extent by Wilson Ramos and/or Jesus Flores and Ross Detwiler and/or John Lannan. Note those “and/or’s” because Rizzo may not be done dealing, especially since Detwiler is out of options. As we saw earlier this month with the Perry-for-Balester trade, Rizzo is quite willing to make a trade to get that roster flexibility (insert Garrett Mock joke here) he covets.

So it’s Peacock and Cole for Gio, essentially, with Norris and Milone as insurance. If Gio does indeed improve his control while maintaining his GB rate and K rates, then this could be a trade that works out for both organizations.

I now return you to the howling on Twitter.

UPDATE — The trade also included 24-year-old RHP Robert Gilliam, who is not in the upper echelons of Oakland’s prospects. The best that I could find on him came from a fantasy baseball site, Razzball.com:

Pitched well in an extreme hitting environment – High-A Stockton (California League). In 164⅓ innings, Gilliam had the following ratios: 8.5 K/9, 2.6 BB/9, 1.3 Hr/9, 4.30 FIP, .307 BABIP, 1.30 WHIP. Those aren’t fantastic numbers, but they are noteworthy due to the environment. Could receive a late season call-up if he continues to pitch this well.

Considering that Cole was nearly a lock to move up to Potomac, it would appear that Rizzo has lined up his replacement.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Nats Claim Carlos Rivero On Waivers

Next Post:

Winter League Update

49 Commments

  1. peric says:
    December 22, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    Time to start over at least right-handed starter wise … guess the top 20 prospect list must change? Or will it? πŸ˜‰

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      December 22, 2011 at 4:55 pm

      My first reaction is to not add names for the sake of adding names. Didn’t do it with the Gorzelanny trade.

      I think the only circumstance is if Rizzo trades an MLBer for a prospect in another team’s Top 30.

      1. peric says:
        December 22, 2011 at 5:10 pm

        Let’s hope they get Bradley Meyers back. There may be a shot for him in the rotation after all. Esp. with Wang?

      2. peric says:
        December 22, 2011 at 5:34 pm

        Nats also got a 24 year old RHP named Robert Gilliam.

        1. peric says:
          December 22, 2011 at 5:36 pm

          He looks like a Harrisburg pitcher.

        2. Sue Dinem says:
          December 22, 2011 at 5:53 pm

          Updated it. He *just* turned 24, so my guess is he’s Potomac-bound. Too early to call, though. Just using my ROT regarding Rizzo: one level less than you initially think.

          1. peric says:
            December 22, 2011 at 11:26 pm

            Courtesy of Amanda Comack:

            Gilliam has three things going for him: arm strength, control and a feel for three pitches. He finished third in the California League this season with both 156 strikeouts and 164 1/3 innings, and he’s more than just a throw-in for Washington. Gilliam sits in the 92-94 mph range and while his slider and changeup grade as below-average presently, both could become average offerings with further refinement. That could mean a future in the bullpen, but it also gives him an outside shot at a future as a mid-rotation starter.

          2. peric says:
            December 22, 2011 at 11:29 pm

            Oh, from Baseball America …

  2. TheYellowSlant says:
    December 22, 2011 at 4:57 pm

    Seriously, everyone is going crazy about this trade, and how it was such a rip off.

    Anyone else REALLY glad to have a proven lefty with a career ERA under 3.5, under team control until 2015? And before you mention it, yes I know about the walks.

    1. peric says:
      December 22, 2011 at 5:02 pm

      He’s 26 and so may still have celing: if he is teach-able they can teach him to reduce the walks. But they’ve failed to do that with Lannan. He is a 200 ip pitcher 2 years running so in that Rizzo got what he wanted when he couldn’t get Buehrle. A guy with better stuff from the left-side.

      However, he did pay far more for this guy than would have for Buehrle even at 4 years +. This is an enormous risk for the Nationals when Cole was made part of the bargain.

      Plus there is no depth behind the 5-6 starters in the majors in AAA now except for Yunesky Maya and perhaps Stammen.

      I think they need Oswalt.

    2. BinM says:
      December 22, 2011 at 5:43 pm

      Pricey yes; A ripoff, maybe not. It does muck up the SP depth overall, and seems to effect SYR significantly. I guess we’ll have to see what the rest of the off-season yields.

  3. peric says:
    December 22, 2011 at 5:09 pm

    NFA_Brian: Like the GG deal, Strasburg, Gonzalez, & Zimmermann is very good young 1-2-3 for the next four years.

    Guess that settles that.

  4. jeff550 says:
    December 22, 2011 at 5:24 pm

    Just noticed that I could only come up with 2 names that could start in Syracuse now, and they are Erik Arnesen and Yunesky Maya. #needsmoredepth

    1. peric says:
      December 22, 2011 at 5:37 pm

      Craig Stammen, and probably, Bradley Meyers unless he makes the 25 man out of ST with the Yankees.

      1. jeff550 says:
        December 22, 2011 at 7:25 pm

        I think Stammen is a reliver at this point, not a starter

  5. BinM says:
    December 22, 2011 at 5:46 pm

    This trade will likely kick the Nationals out of ‘top-ten’ considerations, fwtw.

    1. peric says:
      December 22, 2011 at 11:01 pm

      Harper, Rendon, Hood, Purke, Solis (unless injured), Lombardozzi, Meyer … and there might be others who rise up … so they may still at least be on the cusp?

      1. souldrummer says:
        December 22, 2011 at 11:07 pm

        Our status as an elite system now rides on this year’s crop, Goodwin, Purke and Meyer. Lombardozzi and Hood don’t register but so much.

        Here’s hoping that Solis is fine and can avoid the dreaded knife.

  6. James says:
    December 22, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    I’m reserving my comments on this. We won’t know how it’s all played out for probably two years, at least.

  7. Positively Half St. says:
    December 22, 2011 at 6:52 pm

    I do love that this happened the same day as Boswell’s impatient column today. I also hope that he keeps writing that way, since I grew up with the NY overreactions, and such conversations “angry up the blood.”

    Anyway, as obsessed as I am with this blog and NFA before it, I am excited to witness the first time that the Nats have depth enough to pull this off. When Rizzo nearly pulled off the Greinke trade last year, the cost seemed prohibitive, and would have cut too close to the bone. Even if Syracuse looks light in the staff this year, the Nats don’t.

    We are Prince Fielder away from the playoffs, at most.

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      December 22, 2011 at 6:58 pm

      Well, I sure hope it’s coincidental because as the old saw goes, if Mike Rizzo starts paying attention too much to the whining in the stands, he’ll be sitting next to them before long.

      You can count me among the folks that feel a little disheartened that the farm has been weakened, but at the same time the parent club has been strengthened. Sometimes we need a little reminding that that’s *always* the endgame.

      1. peric says:
        December 22, 2011 at 10:58 pm

        One determining factor had to be the fact the Rizzo, Clark, Harris, Minnitti et al appear to be at their best when drafting pitchers. And 2012 brings another draft. I bet they now wish they had went way over slot to haul in Laxer and Hawtin. That would might have made it far less of a risk plus given the new cap on draft bonuses. Which may effect their draft strategies. IMO as long as the payroll stays depressed they should continue to go over-slot and cap and pay the luxury tax if need be.

  8. Mark L says:
    December 22, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    Let’s be totally honest here, this was much cheaper, moneywise, than actually going to get a veteren pitcher to help out with with the young studs. The Nats sure saved a lot of money doing it this way. Boswell was right about the cheapness factor.

    Rizzo and the rest of the F.O. better pray every night before they go to bed that they get Meyers back.

    1. Natty Fan says:
      December 23, 2011 at 12:29 am

      So, trading away young, cost-controlled minor-league talent for a more expensive major league player is “cheap”? And you really think the Nats are much more likely to make a playoff run over the next 4 years with a declining Mark Buehrle or a banged up Roy Oswalt (on a one-year contract), than they would be with a 26-year old starter with two years of 200+ IP and ERA+ of over 125?

      1. Mark L says:
        December 23, 2011 at 9:26 am

        Part of your answer contradicts the other part.
        The Nats have a LOT of room payroll-wise, and ,yes, Gonzales is a whole lot cheaper than Oswalt.

        1. Natty Fan says:
          December 23, 2011 at 1:50 pm

          I wasn’t arguing that Oswalt was cheaper than Gonzalez. You’re conflating the two points I’m made:

          1) Gonzalez was traded for 4 minor leaguers/MLB-minimum guys. He’ll be arbitration-eligible soon, and will likely earn more money than those 4 players combined over the next 4 years. I think this counters your contention that this was primarily a cost-savings move.

          2) Gonzalez is better addition to the Nats staff than the Nats’ two recent FA targets, Buehrle and Oswalt. I think that adding another young stud is better than acquiring an older, declining veteran pitcher “to help out with the young studs.”

          Which of these points do you take issue with?

  9. Dougie 3 says:
    December 22, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    A horrible, horrible trade.

  10. Natsfan/hater says:
    December 22, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    I love the fact that we got Gio and the Yankees didn’t. I think this guy still has growth and we have him under contract for many years. I’m sorry to see Peacock go because he was a home grown guy who came on with alot of talent out of nowhere. Anyway, I wish Peacock, Milone, Norris, and Cole the best of luck; I even think they might have better opportunities to get to the big’s with their new organization.
    My biggest concern is Syracuse. Who is going to start there? I know Maya will be back but lets face it, he sucks. Detwiler is out of options and Meyers is now a Yankee. Is Arnesen even coming back; he can’t be happy about the way the organization handled him last year. Are Tatusko and Roark even options; not in my opinion. Solis…hurt again. OK, who starts in Syracuse?

    1. souldrummer says:
      December 22, 2011 at 11:05 pm

      Still a lot of time to get credible talent for Syracuse it’s just that talent is more likely to be AAAA than genuine prospects now. Tatusko can’t be an option. They converted him to a reliever last year and he’s been relieving in winter ball to my knowledge.

  11. John C. says:
    December 22, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    Prospects can seduce you – remember when the Mets’ rotation was going to be great for years thanks to Pulsipher, Wilson and Isringhausen? Cole is an exciting prospect who hasn’t played above low A ball. I get this deal from both teams’ perspective. Face it – with four years of control (and at least the first two were going to be even within the A’s budget), the A’s were going to have to be blown away with an offer to move Gonzalez. This trade may or may not work out for either/both sides, but the more I think about it the less upset I am.

  12. souldrummer says:
    December 22, 2011 at 10:11 pm

    I’m glad that I’ve had the chance to read some of the comments above here. Knowing that NFA_Brian likes the deal is very reassuring to me. He follows prospects as closely as anyone and his thumbs up to this deal tempers my own initial reaction that three of our top pitchers is one too many.

    AJ Cole is the one that hurts me the most. I feel Peacock is not going to be better than Gonzalez. I feel Norris is blocked and I feel that Milone is more in the back end of the rotation. This puts pressure on Rizzo’s most recent draft to pan out if we want to have prospects the next time he gets the itch to make a move.

    Perhaps the feeling is that the free agent market just isn’t strong enough for us this year. I so wish we’d been able to sign Buerhle and avoid this kind of move. I’d rather we went after Oswalt for a year and trust our prospects more.

    Our rotation is certainly good enough to contend in our division. Is the offense? There’s got to be a move for either Fielder or Cespedes to follow this up or I’m not feeling this.

    If we don’t advance beyond the wild card play-in before AJ Cole hits the big leagues I’ll consider us having lost this trade.

  13. peric says:
    December 23, 2011 at 1:41 am

    http://topprospectalert.com/2011/12/13/2012-washington-nationals-top-15-prospect-rankings/

    1. g_burg says:
      December 25, 2011 at 3:05 pm

      All four in the top 10
      http://topprospectalert.com/2011/11/22/2012-oakland-athletics-top-15-prospect-rankings/

      1. Sue Dinem says:
        December 25, 2011 at 3:52 pm

        Not a surprise — the A’s system was ranked 28th prior to the 2011 season by BA.

  14. jeeves says:
    December 23, 2011 at 7:00 am

    Gonzalez’s era away from home–4.24. Not a big fan of the trade. I believe the Nats gave up too much, but i’m still excited about the new top of our rotation at the major league level. Call me ambivalent.

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      December 23, 2011 at 7:26 am

      Ambivalent — Generally speaking, the A.L. has more hitter’s parks than pitcher’s parks and the reverse is true for the N.L. Also, you can subtract another 0.25 to 0.40 ERA by virtue of pitching to the pitcher instead the DH.

      1. Mark L says:
        December 23, 2011 at 9:30 am

        Sue, you’re more qualified to address this than me, but isn’t there a huge hole in the Nats rotation in regards to mentoring. That was the idea behind a Buerhle or Oswaly; they’re both declining but have been through the wars before and can help the pups.

        1. Sue Dinem says:
          December 23, 2011 at 10:33 am

          Mentoring makes for a nice storyline, but I’ve seen no objective evidence to suggest a tangible effect. I know that sounds stat-nerd, but what does that say about a team’s pitching coach if that were truly necessary?

        2. BinM says:
          December 23, 2011 at 11:49 am

          Mentoring – codeword for overpaying a stop-gap old fart until the prospects break through.

          1. Mark L says:
            December 23, 2011 at 12:24 pm

            Hey BinM — I thought you were very sensitive to the term ‘old fart’. πŸ™‚

  15. Positively Half St. says:
    December 23, 2011 at 9:43 am

    It would be nice to have a more experienced arm to mentor the young guys, but don’t forget that mentoring young pitchers is one of Davey Johnson’s strengths.

    +1/2St.

  16. Todd Boss says:
    December 23, 2011 at 9:46 am

    I posted my thoughts here http://www.nationalsarmrace.com/?p=3509, but on the whole I like the deal. You can nit pick Gonzalez’s numbers here and there, but the fact remains that he’s a strike out guy who was unlucky not to win 20 games last year. Successful pre-arb pitchers are the absolute rarest commodity in the game, and the Nats paid for it in kind.

    Norris was destined for trade bait, Milone looks like a 4-A pitcher. I’m not convinced Peacock can ever get a quality 3rd pitch and is destined for middle relief. Cole is the wild card; if he turns into Verlander in 4 years we’ll look bad. But if Cole tops out as something less than what Gonzalez is, we’ll look like geniuses.

    We thin the farm system absolutely. We kill our starting pitcher depth (pray for no injuries, else we’ll be giving starts to guys like Maya and Stammen again). But we also have a pretty durn good 1-2-3 now, to go with a 4-5 that aren’t half bad themselves. If Lannan is your #4 pitcher with his sub 4.00 era, you’re doing well.

    1. peric says:
      December 23, 2011 at 1:40 pm

      And if Meyer and his 100 mph fast ball become another Strasburg? It still all evens out. Plus the Nat’s draft mavens have another draft in 2012. Have to see how they handle the new draft bonus cap. If I were them I would be strategizing on how to go over that cap and pay the minimum freight in fines. Still makes sense to build from within while signing just a few key free agents.

  17. Pingback: Sickels Revises His Top 20 Nationals Prospects | NationalsProspects.com
  18. Pingback: Welcome Back, A.J. Cole - NationalsProspects.com
  19. Pingback: A.J. Cole Named Carolina League Pitcher of the Week - NationalsProspects.com
  20. Pingback: Nats Trade Ray, et al For Doug Fister » NationalsProspects.com
  21. Pingback: A.J. Cole Named Eastern League Pitcher of the Week » NationalsProspects.com
  22. Pingback: The Preliminary 2017 Watchlist – NationalsProspects.com

Comments are closed.

Pay The Bills




About/Contact/Misc.

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Resources

  • NationalsProspects on BlueSky
  • NationalsProspects on Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • The Big Board
  • The Nats Draft Tracker
  • The Nats IFA Tracker

Blogroll

  • District On Deck
  • Fredericksburg Nationals (Facebook)
  • MLB.com Nationals Draft Tracker
  • Musings about Sports…
  • Rochester Red Wings (Facebook)
  • Senators Fan Club (Facebook)
  • TalkNats.com
  • The Nats Report
  • Wilmington Blue Rocks (Facebook)

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
© 2025 NationalsProspects.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters