Skip to content

NationalsProspects.com

NationalsProspects.com

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

The New CBA

November 22, 2011

Paging Brian Oliver…Mr. Oliver, the white phone please…

In the interest of passing along the analysis for folks to digest over the next few days:

  • MLB Bonus Baby cuts to the chase: “The entire concept of a draft needs to be seen for what it actually is: a cartel by the owners of 30 organizations to restrict the income of incoming players.”
  • The idea that amateurs have been sold down even further down the river is a common sentiment online right now…
  • …Followed closely by the idea that small-market teams can longer invest heavily in the draft instead of free agents.
  • For an thumbnail sketch that’s less minors-oriented, check out MLB Trade Rumors Summary…
  • …as well as the Biz of Baseball’s take.

For my money — and it’s not my money — the knee-jerk reaction that two-sport athletes will be driven away is probably overblown. Baseball’s been losing that battle for quite some time now and it’s why the international pipeline has become so prominent.

On the other hand, as that first link lays out the $2.9M ceiling for under-23 IFAs is going to level the playing field and take away a tool for rebuilding that teams like Texas and Seattle have been using to rebuild. Perhaps some will chortle that the Nats have never come close to spending that kind of money post-Smiley, but now they can’t for at least the next five years.

As a consolation, there are some provisions to give small- and low-revenue clubs extra draft picks. More interesting is that these can be traded. That could be game-changing or it could be disastrous.

Perhaps the most interesting wrinkle is that immediately-on-the-40 deals are now disallowed. Just like the rule that changed amateur to first-year player, this is a move against Scott Boras. Might be good for the clubs, but like nearly everything else, it’s going to depress salaries.

Lastly, there seems to be a sentiment that this will chase more players to college. That’s true, but what remains to be seen is how teams will allocate their signing budgets. I haven’t seen anything to the effect of changing when players can be drafted out of college, but I somehow doubt that they’ll allow one-and-dones like the NBA.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

The Preliminary 2012 Watchlist, Part One

Next Post:

The Preliminary 2012 Watchlist, Part Two

7 Commments

  1. BinM says:
    November 22, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    It will be interesting to see how the new CBA plays out from the amateur side of things, to be sure. Will teams start to lay off of HS players with letters of commitment, and tilt more toward JR-eligible / SR college players? Will the International “pool” fund limits apply to players from the NPL (whom I believe have a separate agreement with MLB)?

    I see some of the moves (no MLB contracts, punitative caps on draft expenditures) as being focused against the ‘super-agents’ like Boras, but the flipside is that the Players’ Association looks at this as just more $$$ to be poured into their pockets at Free Agency. This is likely why they signed off on some of the other items (HGH testing, tobacco use restrictions) so readily. The bottom line is, Boras & the other agents will just have to wait longer for the money they siphon off of the players they represent, but more Arbitration cases will likely be a side-effect.

  2. peric says:
    November 22, 2011 at 9:16 pm

    Just read about it over at HangingSliders …

    Sounds like two salary caps or pools for “amateur” players. One for the US draftees and one for International Signings. With increasing in severity penalties for going beyond them.

    Looks like they went after Boras for the major league contracts. He seems to get his top amateur talent major league contracts. No more of that.

  3. souldrummer says:
    November 23, 2011 at 11:58 am

    I’m still in the process of reading some of the articles linked to here. I did get through all of MLBBonusBaby’s article, though. It’s good that we maximized the chance to go overslot during the limited window that we had to do so because that option appears to be off the table.

    Seems to me that this all about making sure free agency is where clubs choose to spend or overspend and I’m not sure that’s a good thing. Restricting the international dollars seems to me to be particularly unfair. No more Aroldis Chapman’s I guess. How would Yunesky Maya’s deal have been processed? It would have taken all of our cap money and given us no on the field return, correct?

    –SD

    1. BinM says:
      November 23, 2011 at 7:54 pm

      The more immediate effect is that Cepedes’ dreams of immediate riches just got blown to smithereens. That $30M windfall bonus he & his Agent/Buscone were looking for just got reduced to about $1.5M (or less).

    2. jeff550 says:
      November 23, 2011 at 9:45 pm

      If I understant it right, the new rule would not have effected Chapman or Maya, as they are over the age of 23, and would not count against the IFA cap

  4. Sue Dinem says:
    November 23, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    And I keep hearing “This will make the college game better” but I’m not sure how this will increase the number of scholarships a school has. Did not Cal nearly kill its program?

    1. BinM says:
      November 23, 2011 at 7:46 pm

      I’m not seeing how the new CBA will “make the college game better” either. It might push 40-60 high school players per year into honoring their Letters of Committment & waiting to see if their draft stock improves, or nudge some of them into Indy Leagues, hoping to be signed as UFA’s.

      With the severe penalties being imposed for total ‘over-slot’ bonuses paid, the MLB owners might come back after a year or two & ask to re-think this part of the CBA, should their annual signing counts drop off significantly.

Comments are closed.

Pay The Bills




About/Contact/Misc.

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Resources

  • NationalsProspects on BlueSky
  • NationalsProspects on Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • The Big Board
  • The Nats Draft Tracker
  • The Nats IFA Tracker

Blogroll

  • District On Deck
  • Fredericksburg Nationals (Facebook)
  • MLB.com Nationals Draft Tracker
  • Musings about Sports…
  • Rochester Red Wings (Facebook)
  • Senators Fan Club (Facebook)
  • TalkNats.com
  • The Nats Report
  • Wilmington Blue Rocks (Facebook)

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
© 2025 NationalsProspects.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters