Skip to content

NationalsProspects.com

NationalsProspects.com

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Sickels On The Pitchers

February 9, 2011

A look at the Nationals pitchers profiled in John Sickels 2011 prospect book

Shortly after Thanksgiving, John Sickels revealed his Top 20 for the Nationals. A little more than three weeks ago, we learned that three Nationals made his Top 50 batters list. Now, let’s take a look at the rest of the players.

I decided to break this up by batters and pitchers, since Sickels doesn’t rank them like BA. Instead he gives letter grades… and he doesn’t grade on a curve — he is very, very tough. As he himself puts it, a C+ grade is good praise, but he is careful to note that the grade is relative, i.e. a Rookie-ball Grade C prospect could end up a star while a AAA grade C is likely to end up as a backup or long reliever.

When it comes to pitchers, Sickels has some guiding principals…

…AA is the ultimate test for finesse pitchers

…K/BB ratio is a strong bellwether

…K/IP ratio can indicate “stuff” but not necessarily velocity

…H/IP ratio is a good complement to K/IP, but should be taken with a grain of salt given the variances in defense [and scorekeeping]

…HR rate — all things being equal, young pitchers that don’t give a lot of HRs are better than those that do

As you might have guessed, Sickels is a Bill James disciple in that he uses statistics to help identify trends and anomalies (see below with Brad Peacock). But he most certainly believes in the value in scouting to identify the intangibles like effort, body language, kinetics, athleticism, etc.

Here’s a look at the 21 pitchers that Sickels graded (2010 grade in parentheses)…

A.J. Cole – B Tyler Hanks – C Tanner Roark – C
Sammy Solis – B Taylor Jordan – C Brian Broderick – C
Robby Ray – B- Josh Smoker – C (C) Atahualpa Severino – C (C)
Brad Peacock – C+ (C) Paul Demny – C (C) Josh Wilkie – C (C)
Henry Rodriguez – C+ (B-) Elvin Ramirez – C Adam Carr – C (B- in ’08)
Brad Meyers – C+ (C+) Danny Rosenbaum – C Adrian Alaniz – C (C)
Cole Kimball – C+ Tom Milone – C (C) Yunesky Maya – C

So why are some of those guys bolded? Glad you asked. These are the guys that weren’t listed in the BA book, and I take a great deal of pride that nearly all of them made our watchlist.

A couple of other notes…
…Rob Wort was one of three Nationals to make the manuscript but not the book — which Sickels calls his “cutting room floor” — and would have been listed as a Grade-C prospect.

…Brad Peacock and Danny Rosenbaum were both given Sickels’ “Sleeper Alert” tag. Peacock got the nod because there is a disconnect between his stuff and his results; he’s never had an ERA below 4.00 yet has a career W-L of 19-35 while his FIPs have been consistently lower than his ERAs (e.g. 3.14 vs. 4.44 at Potomac). With Rosenbaum, it’s more of a gut feel based on his strong GO/AO ratio (1.90) and perhaps, as he alluded back in November, he’s something of a Milone clone (hey, that rhymes).

I’d give more detail (as I did last year, but that was *after* the printed run had sold out), but knowing that Sickels is basically a two-person operation (he and his wife Jeri), I’d strongly recommend folks purchase the book and support what I consider to be the best in the business.

[For those wondering, the pic is a nod to the “hanging fruit” metaphor in the comments. That’s what’s known as an orchard ladder, used for picking the fruit from the highest branches]

Post navigation

Previous Post:

The BA Prospect Handbook, Part Two

Next Post:

Sickels On The Hitters

18 Commments

  1. Bob Howes says:
    February 9, 2011 at 8:30 am

    I am somewhat new to all this, but am curious as to why Tome Milone after his strong numbers in the last two years isn’t rated higher as a prospect. Why is someone like Solis rated so much higher?

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      February 9, 2011 at 9:46 am

      Milone is considered a soft-tosser (84-87) and turns 24 next week. Solis is 18 months younger and breaks 90, occasionally touching 94 or so. Scouts are always going to favor the younger and harder-throwing guy. Milone is a favorite here and in fairness both Sickels and BA have warmed up to him (after I and others have been banging the drum for him 😉

  2. Pingback: Tweets that mention Sickels On The Pitchers -- Topsy.com
  3. Souldrummer says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:37 am

    I’ll keep banging that Milone drum! Anyways, be still my beating heart, Alex Cintron has gotten a spring training invite.

  4. Souldrummer says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:45 am

    Certainly not a problem posting these grades. Roughly the same info is in the Top Nationals Preseason Prospects for 2011thread at minorleague.ball. Sickels seems to like sharing the grades and discussing them on his forum. I think part of the strength of his stuff is that he does interact with his users and is responsive to their concerns and interests.

    Kind of waiting to see where I’m swinging budget wise (buying books is always a couple of my bleacher games) and big club vs. minors attendance before I decide whether to go with Sickels or my standard BP first this year.

  5. Michael Schmidt says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:56 am

    Sue – thanks for crunching this info. Looking at it from the perspective of how Rizzo’s most recent activity has impacted the Nats’ prospect pool, it appears that of Sickels’ prospects, 9 of the 21 pitchers joined the Nats in 2010. 4 through the draft (Cole, Solis, Ray, Hanks), 2 via trade (Rodriguez, Roark), 1 intl signee (Maya) and 2 via the Rule 5 (Broderick, Ramirez). Seeing that 3 are from HS and so many came to the Nats within the last year gives me hope for the future!! I’ve not seen Sickels’ book previously, but after reading your blogpost, I am going to check into buying it. Thanks again.

  6. peric says:
    February 9, 2011 at 10:59 am

    It seems like the only way Milone comes up (and Rosenbaum who I guess is a year behind?) is if they move Lannan and Livo (or send Livo to the bullpen).

    1. Souldrummer says:
      February 9, 2011 at 12:56 pm

      No way Milone’s coming up this year. He’s a guy who has got to prove it at each level given his stuff. After that, if he can duplicate his success at AAA he will have his opportunity to compete for the slots that Marquis and Livo vacate.

      1. peric says:
        February 9, 2011 at 2:41 pm

        If Milone manages to duplicate in ST 2011 and into the season in Syracuse? I can’t see having two soft tossing left handed pitchers in Lannan and Milone? Can’t be silly here on this blog … its about prospects … and like Tampa Bay and KC knowing when to sell high … and not wait for the value to go low. Lannan’s value took a bit of a tumble last year. It might be propitious to trade him now (a left handed starting pitcher who is still young with 3 years of major league starting experience) when injuries hit those competitive teams … like the White Sox and Cubs … and even the Indians (we know Acta would probably love to have Lannan).

        Buy low, sell high. With Milone and Rosenbaum, both lefties, you can and should do that.

      2. BinM says:
        February 9, 2011 at 5:11 pm

        The fans at Nationals Park might see Milone sometime this year, but probably not until after the trade deadline at the earliest. Should he continue to perform well in SYR in 2011, I see no reason why he shouldn’t be given a chance at a rotation job for 2012.

  7. Berndaddie says:
    February 9, 2011 at 11:07 am

    Thanks for all this info Sue!!! Your a baseball poet and I want you to know it…. 😉

  8. Souldrummer says:
    February 9, 2011 at 11:07 am

    Curious if you or Brian have gotten a chance to look at Kilgore’s stuff on the state of the Nats in the DR. Two names to watch by bonus are Raudy Read a 17 year old catcher we signed for 130K and Randy Novas a 150K purported 5 tool player who is currently a 16 year old outfielder.

    1. Sue Dinem says:
      February 9, 2011 at 11:17 am

      Seen the articles and put those names into the noggin for future reference.

  9. Mel says:
    February 9, 2011 at 11:59 am

    great article. Now here is some headline news. All of the ranking and all of the writing that goes on is a great intro duction to the season. But the ultimate literature will be done on the diamond. The pitchers will show themselves as prospects or not and the proof will be in the pudding

  10. David S says:
    February 9, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    “AA is the ultimate test for finesse pitchers”…. 12-5 2.85 ERA, K/BB ratio 6.74, WHIP 1.165, K/9 ratio 8.8, H/9 ratio 9.2 in 27 games started. I’d say Milone passes the AA test. I don’t care that the throws 86 mph and is only 24 years old. He gets batters out. Is he getting invited to Spring Training?

  11. jeff e. says:
    February 9, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    thank goodness for my 4X4 this past week with the weather!
    lcontinued crossed fingers for Josh Smoker to find his stuff. HS schooler who could blossom later.
    Cintron seems like a guy who can compliment the mix @ SYR for Knorr.
    interesting that Chiefs roster as of today has Valdez (3b).
    am I a psychic or what?? Ankiel and Nix. perhaps I will ease off the Burgess hammering since
    Rizzo is reshaping the depth chart as HIS with Corey Brown and the two vets to buy time @ the top of the chart. My hunch still wants to see how Moldenhauer plays this summer off his 8 HRs @ Vermont last SS.
    three trades made by Nats with Yanx ( Clippard, Gonzo and now the Pole). lets forget that sucker deal where expos traded Westbrook, Lilly and Parker for Irabu-booooo.

  12. BinM says:
    February 9, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    Looking at the list, I’m guessing that either Broderick or Rodriguez might have bumped Wort; SP’s rate higher than RP’s, but a triple-digit heater at SYR/WSH trumps a developing RP at POT. I’m ok with that; Having 20+ pitchers that Sickels grades out at a solid C or higher speaks well for the organization.

    High-school arms are usually the most volatile portion of any ranking – with only two (Cole & Ray) in the Nationals top-21, the list is probably stable enough to maintain a mid-level ranking through 2012, imo.

  13. John C. says:
    February 10, 2011 at 11:41 am

    Of the Guzman twins, it’s interesting that BA likes Tatusko better than Roark and Sickels is apparently the other way around. If either one of them makes it, that’s a huge plus deal for the Nationals!

Comments are closed.

Pay The Bills




About/Contact/Misc.

  • About
  • FAQs
  • 2025 Watchlist and Player Reports
  • Too Old For The Level?
  • Road Trips

Resources

  • NationalsProspects on BlueSky
  • NationalsProspects on Facebook
  • RSS Feed
  • The Big Board
  • The Nats Draft Tracker
  • The Nats IFA Tracker

Blogroll

  • District On Deck
  • Fredericksburg Nationals (Facebook)
  • MLB.com Nationals Draft Tracker
  • Musings about Sports…
  • Rochester Red Wings (Facebook)
  • Senators Fan Club (Facebook)
  • TalkNats.com
  • The Nats Report
  • Wilmington Blue Rocks (Facebook)

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
© 2025 NationalsProspects.com | Powered by WordPress | Theme by MadeForWriters