Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
Love the use of Paul Hardcastle
As a teacher, you’ll appreciate what I showed the students when I was a grad student prior to my lecture about The Vietnam War and The Media. Yes, I worked for a very cool professor.
Ditto with the Hardcastle reference. There’s always the Steely Dan’s 19, too…
Nicely done. Yeah, I tend to trust Sickels more than I trust MLB Network. With Sickels I feel like it’s his full time gig and he tends to be hard on the guys. With MLB Network you’re kind of bound to make lists that make sense to John Hart and I don’t think he’s beating the bushes scouting people in person. Mayo pretty much admitted that he’s pollilng individual scouts and his own list of contacts. I guess that’s okay, but I trust Sickels a bit more.
The one reason that I watched the MLB Network show live is that I believe that it’s a (relatively) inexpensive mass medium that a lot of people will watch. Plus it will be easier to see free video clips of the guys profiled.
Shows you how wild those lists are when Norris and Espinosa rank at 25 and 38 on Sickels but don’t even make the top 50 for MLB network.
I’m with you on trusting Sickels more than an MLB Network list. Sickels and BA I probably listen to the most. Law puts out very good stuff as well. Here’s a ranking of the systems that a poster did on Sickels site based upon Sickels grades it’s a very good read: http://www.minorleagueball.com/2011/1/7/1921427/john-sickels-farm-system-rankings . Has us ranked 13 overall as a system. Which list are you referring to with Norris(25) and Espinosa(38) is that his top 100 or just the top 50 hitting prospects?
With the lack of people loosing there prospect eligibility this year in our farm system and the new talent that will come through the draft I think we have a chance to be atleast a top 15 system next year.
Never mind I see those numbers came from Sickels top 50 hitting prospects not his top 100. I think Norris is probably on the later end of Sickels top 50 overall and Espinosa is on the outside of the top 50. Just a guess…
Whoops. I was cruising there pretty quickly and didn’t realize that I was looking only at a hitting prospects list when I searched. Thanks for the catch.
The problem is Tampa Bay is really going to push the envelope if their ownership let’s that FO draft who they really want and sign them. Its going to be hard to move up in the organizational rankings with TB and KC on top.
I see that Wilberto Ortiz was signed by the Dodgers on a minor league deal; His winter playing in Puerto Rico seems to have paid off. For the POT fans among us, looks like it’s another round of Souza manning 3B in 2011.
I think you might mean Stephen King, because Souza hasn’t played above Hagerstown. Wouldn’t shock me if both were to play (Souza at 3B, King at SS).
Sue_D: You’re right, of course. I mistakenly thought that Souza had ‘bumped’ to POT in 2009. Oops.
FWIW, all the expected “top-ten” voices have been heard from (BA, BP, ESPN, Fangraphs, Hardball Times, John Sickels & our own Sue_Dinem), and here’s the composite results.
Consensus (Listed on 7 of 7).
#1- Bryce Harper: #1 across the board; Like that was gonna be hard.
#2- Derek Norris: #2 on 6 of 7 lists, (HBT-Hagen) has him at #3.
#3- Danny Espinosa: 3.28 average; High = (HBT-Hagen) at #2, low = (Law-ESPN) at #5.
#4- A.J. Cole: 3.7 average; High = Sue_D at #2[P], low = Sickels at #5.
#5- Wilson Ramos: 5.0 average; High = (Law-ESPN) at #3, low = #6 (Fg/BP/Sickels).
#6- Sammy Solis: 5.0 average; High = Sue_D at #1(P), low = #8 (HBT-Hagen).
#7- Eury Perez: 8.0 average; Listed between #7 – #9 from all sources.
Non-consensus
#8- J.P. Ramirez: 9.8 average, on 5 of 7 lists; High = #6 (Hagen-HBT), low = off-list (BA-Fitt & Law-ESPN).
#9- Chris Marrero: 10.0 average, on 6 of 7 lists; Ranged from #5[H] (Sue_D) to off-list (Hulet-Fg).
#10- Brad Peacock: 12.2 average, on 5 of 7 lists; High = #8[P] (Sue_D) to off-list (BA-Fitt & Law-ESPN).
Simple Majority (4 of 7)
Cole Kimball & Robbie Ray.
BinM,
Thanks, great stuff.